The Montrose borough council met on July first. Various topics were covered.

Ms. Skinner asked about a letter from Time Warner, wondering what it would do to the Franchise Agreement. Mr. Lamont felt that it shouldn’t affect it, all it was doing was changing some channels from digital to analog. He said that if a person was getting service now without a cable box, he or she would need a cable box in time.

Mr. Granahan added protocols for asking the borough secretary for assignments to the discussion items section of the agenda.

During the street department report, Mr. DiPhillips related that he had run into Joe Hunt and they had received their elevation permit. A copy had been sent to Carizzo, and they were trying to hammer out a date for the excavation on Coleman Road.

Also, in the conversation with Mr. Hunt, there had been discussion about the parking lot. He asked council if they wished to discuss that topic at that time. They chose to do so.

Mr. Hunt had wanted to know if council had an opportunity to look at the plans he’d submitted. He would lay out the parking lot, and if interested the borough could paint it. Mr. Pickett asked if they were going to top the lot with the agility program that year, wondering if the state was going to do anything. It was not thought that this would happen. It was stated however that the parking lot was in fairly good condition as was, good enough condition at least to hold lines. Mr. DiPhillips pointed out that some of the spaces, near the book store, would be in dirt, but aside from that the lot looked pretty good overall.

Mr. Granahan had met with a few people the day prior, and there had been concerns discussed. One was the concern about changing the one-way directions. He didn’t know if it would be appropriate to change the direction of the existing one-way street, as there might be confusion with people who were used to the existing direction.

At this point in the meeting Ms. Scroggins, a visitor who was videotaping the proceedings, stood up, moved her chair, and started walking about the room. She was asked to please sit in one space, per the rules. She replied that Mr. Granahan kept hiding. She asked to be shown where the rules stated that she had to be in one spot. Mr. Lamont opined that she was a distraction when she moved the chair. Mr. Granahan said that they would move on, and she could do what she had to and they would do what they had to. She returned to a chair and the meeting proceeded.

Mr. Lamont stated that he would agree that they should probably not change the direction. He also mentioned the four spots near Craige’s, which some present felt ought to be left open for access. Another suggestion which Mr. Granahan had received, was to name the lot something to make it easier to identify. The “Livery Lot” had been proposed, as there used to be a livery. Mr. Reimel pointed out however that while he though a name was a good idea, there was an existing Livery Lot on the west side of Public Avenue.

Another question which had been raised regarded part of the egress which exited right next to the light. He questioned whether or not many people used it, as there was the thought of making it a pedestrian walkway. A reporter related that there were a number of cars which parked along the alleyway and loaded and unloaded for the different shops. Mr. Granahan said that they could still load and unload. Mr. Reimel pointed out that if they closed off that alleyway a person would have to back up to get out of the area. Mr. Granahan replied that the point wasn’t to block the alley off, but maybe to make it more pedestrian looking- “designate” it so to speak.

Mr. Pickett asked if they would have to go about abandoning it, but Mr. Lamont said it would be left as an access way, and it would not have to be abandoned.

Finally, Mr. Granahan related that they had been given the Gettysburg business plan. There was a woman willing to type this for $1 a page. This was relevant as there was the plan to put out a 4 or 10 year plan for the borough, and the Gettysburg plan would give them a template to work with. After he was given permission to pursue this, Mr. Reimel suggested getting Mr. Hunt together with the MRC representatives Mr. Granahan had spoken with.

Mr. Reimel wanted to touch on the handicapped parking on Public Avenue. There had been the desire to have more handicapped parking near the middle of that road. They had looked at adding one near Montrose Sporting Goods, as it wasn’t as feasible to do so in front of the theater. All that would be needed, was a blue sign which said van accessible parking with the handicapped signage. Mr. Reimel explained that this would be in addition to existing handicapped parking, the plan was not to close off the spot by the dentist as of that point. He had spoken with Mr. Puzo, and Mr. Puzo felt that as long as they followed those actions they shouldn’t run afoul of the state.

Mr. Lamont wished to add an update to the zoning report, to provide an update on a situation on Lincoln Street where they wanted to convert a barn into a two bedroom apartment. He said that he couldn’t find anything in the zoning that would prohibit it. Potentially there might be more requirements if, per chance, they subdivided the lot, however at the moment the property owner had everything he needed.

Mr. Granahan had a question for Ms. O’Malley regarding Jessup Street. He said that he understood the spigot itself was gone, but the piping remained. He asked what had happened with the magistrate and Dr. Marta, and the money that was ticking away. Ms. O’Malley replied that she never filed an appeal and was thus subject to the fine. Mr. Granahan asked if the borough had to do anything. Ms. O’Malley replied that she would file something. Ms. Skinner spoke up, as she had thought that the magistrate had assigned a $100 fine. Ms. O’Malley and Mr. Granahan replied that the fine had been per day, from the point it was to begin until the spigot was removed.

Mr. Granahan then broached the topic of malicious prosecution in regards to Mr. Stevens and the frivolous lawsuits that he carried on. Ms. O’Malley had said that this was typically not the type of work she did. Mr. Granahan, then, made a motion to ask her to take some time, look into it, and see if there were personal injury attorneys she could look into. She could interview them to see if the borough wanted to put them on contingency to see if the borough could recoup some of their attorney’s fees. They could pursue damages and attorney’s fees under malicious prosecution. The motion was voted on and approved. However, Ms. Skinner opposed the motion, calling it a waste.

Ms. Skinner then asked about June 6th, asking who had given direction to padlock the hydrant (associated with the spigot and water). Mr. Lamont said no one necessarily gave an order, but it was felt it shouldn’t be used when it was declared illegal. Ms. Skinner said that she was on the property on the 7th and the police officer and mayor said that the borough had voted on it. Mr. Lamont said that the only one the police took orders from was the mayor. She suspected that there was a meeting on June 3rd when council was in the back. Mr. Lamont said that he wasn’t going to dignify that, and that anyone could walk in the back and watch him sign the checks.

Ms. Skinner asked the chief of police to see if he had anything on record, because the officer had spent two hours. The chief felt it could be on that officer’s daily log.

Ms. Skinner pointed out the effort in the municipal authority report toward coming to an agreement on the inter-municipality agreement. Mr. Lamont said that it was an effort, but he believed it was rejected.

The bids for the slurry treatment for the roads were opened. There was one from Vestal Asphalt, and one from Suit-Kote. Suit-Kote was the low bid. Mr. DiPhillips said that both vendors were very good vendors. Mr. Lamont asked if he thought both could meet their schedule and he felt they could. Basically they were looking to do one quarter of the roads.

Plans were discussed for the bathrooms at the park. Mr. Reimel said that they had been talking for a year or more about a pre-constructed concrete structure with stainless steel fixtures, from West Virginia. He said that they thought they might put something out locally to see if they could get a better price for a block structure. As it stood right now he didn’t see how they had any choice but to put it where the old one was. Before putting it to bid Mr. Puzo had suggested they send the plans out to COG, to get their approval. Mr. Reimel wished to present the plans then, and see if they could be approved for presentation to COG. Mr. Pickett asked if there were grants which could help with this. Mr. Reimel suggested that there might be grants, but that they might get as much help from private channels as from trying for grants. Ms. Skinner asked what the cost was. Mr. Reimel responded that there was no way to know as the plan had to go to COG before going to bid.

Mr. Lamont asked Ms. Skinner if she had anything regarding record keeping and archiving of records. It was responded that she was still surveying and planned to have a formal report in the future.

When the Time Warner Franchise Agreement was discussed, Mr. Lamont suggested a meeting as he personally objected to the fifteen year agreement. Mr. Reimel said that everyone in the business was looking to extend their lease terms. Mr. Pickett asked when the agreement was up. It was believed that the agreement ended in August of that year. Ms. Skinner agreed that 15 years was too long. Mr. Reimel suggested that they tell the company they wanted a five year contract, and that they could come down and talk to council. Ms. Skinner suggested asking them to pay to survey the borough residents to see if they were satisfied with the service. Mr. Pickett asked if they were in a position to shop around. Mr. Reimel replied that they weren’t, as Time Warner owned the lines. Mr. Lamont pointed out the right to revoke in the agreement. He quipped that basically council couldn’t revoke, though they were given six ways they couldn’t.

Mr. Granahan said that he had spoken to Ms. O’Malley and she had said that she would research protocols used by other boroughs to regulate who had access to the borough secretary. Ms. Skinner asked about whose access this was in reference to. It was responded that it was in reference to access by council. Ms. Skinner asked if this had been a problem, and it was responded by Mr. Granahan that it had. The motion was made for Ms. O’Malley to put together a suggested protocol.

The subject of the Community Center was broached. Mr. Lamont said that they hadn’t received the third party tests from Keystone. It was confirmed that Keystone had been in the building and had provided them a bid to do the testing for mold. The testing was yet to be done. There had been one test completed by Rainbow previously.

Ms. Skinner asked a question, about the June 17th meeting at which there was some discussion about the lease. She asked if there was any provision in the lease about the mold. Someone suggested discussing that topic in executive session. Council then went into executive session, to discuss real estate (the lease) and a personnel discussion.

The executive session ended at 8:32 pm. Mr. Granahan moved pursuant to the executive session to file the draft ethics complaint which had been drafted for them in the matter of Julanne Skinner and the Craig Stevens litigation. The motion was made and approved; Ms. Skinner abstained.

Generally speaking, borough residents can count on Oakland Borough Council’s schedule of meeting the second Thursday of each month at Lanesboro Community Center. But with Community Center renovations taking longer than expected, Oakland officials had no choice but to gather elsewhere for their July 11th meet. “Elsewhere,” as it turned out, was in their home borough, at the home/office of Secretary/Treasurer Flo Brush on Wilson Avenue.

Present for the meeting were President Ron Beavan, and Councilmen Jack Agler, Eric Page, Brian Rhone, Dave Dibble, and Gary Boughton. Also present was the aforementioned Flo Brush, as well as Mayor Randy Glover.

The evening’s pleasant temperature and comfortable humidity enticed attendees to accept Secretary Brush’s proposal for an out-door back-deck meeting under clear skies. President Beavan gaveled the session to order at 7:01 p.m. By way of the pledge of allegiance, a moment of silence, and the reading of The Declaration of Independence borough council patriotically recalled our forefathers’ sacrifices and those continuing to sacrifice for our freedom today.

Perfunctory approval of council’s last meeting minutes and treasurer’s report, followed by review of the time sheets, led council into the muddy waters of the Codes Report. President Beavan provided a timely review of the status of five private properties under the borough’s watchful eye. Two properties are under almost constant monitoring; one having made gradual progress, and the second apparently sliding backward into slovenly decrepitude. After much discussion borough council concluded that forceful measures will have to be administered to bring the second property into code compliance. Code Enforcement Officer Shane Lewis will also be notified to increase pressure.

Council moved on to discuss three other properties: one having made substantial (rated 80%) improvement, and two others - one up for tax sale, and the other in foreclosure - which appear on a downward glide-path of neglect and disrepair. Council agreed to go along with President Beavan’s approach of reminding the “responsible” parties of at least their minimal duties to maintain property. Should the “responsible” parties continue to ignore their obligations, further measures will be contemplated.

Councilman Boughton provided the Parks Report. He noted that virtually all of the graffiti, excepting that on the jungle gym, has been removed. He further submitted a bill of $50.30 for the cost of paint, which bill was approved. Mr. Boughton discussed the need for moving a water line at the park, and council agreed that he should proceed to obtain an estimate for the costs associated. He also noted that juvenile miscreants are continuing to wreak havoc at the park. As such, council reached consensus that the commencement of any capital improvements at the park would be senseless until the culprits are apprehended or discontinue their campaign of chaos. To that end, council discussed increased police presence and technologically advanced surveillance measures to snare the perpetrators.

On that note, the meeting transitioned into the Mayor’s Report. Mayor Glover provided a Media Report, of all police actions during the month of June, to every person in attendance. The report included an assortment of non-violent crime in Oakland Boro: Two cases of fraud: one for checks stolen and cashed, and one for identity theft; One burglary: a break-in over-night through the house back door; One case of larceny/theft; One noise complaint: upstairs neighbor making too much noise; Three vehicle-related incidents: one traffic stop; one suspicious vehicle; and one report of “girlfriend driving [boyfriend’s] vehicle with permission.”; One miscellaneous request for Oakland PD to perform a residence check.

Mayor Glover added that Officer John Kreamer is now fully certified and integrated into the borough’s police force.

Finally, under New Business, finances came to the fore on several fronts. Treasurer Flo Brush prepared and distributed a financial report for the first six months of the fiscal year. Absent its availability for prior detailed examination, the narrative intimated the borough’s finances are sound and revenues appear sufficient to meet anticipated expenses. President Beavan expressed the consensus of those present, “I think we’re being good stewards of our money.”

Another “interesting” financial matter was brought up. The borough is in receipt of its check from the PUC (Public Utility Commission) for Act 13 monies. The funds, totaling nearly $30,000, necessarily elicited discussion as to what might be their best use. President Beavan suggested that the funds be earmarked to be put toward a borough building. Council concurred.

But then President Beavan and Treasurer Brush added an interesting twist; one which any Philadelphia lawyer could appreciate. Treasurer Brush pointed out that if the Act 13 funds were applied to the Water Authority’s account, it would essentially bring their account current. Council agreed. And so, all Act 13 funds, council voted, will be deposited in the Water Authority’s account so that the Authority can use the money to repay Oakland Borough the monies owed. After the 24 to 48 hours of shifting monies around, the Water Authority will have its account brought current and the borough will once again have the monies earmarked within the general fund for acquisition/construction of a borough building.

While the above financial sleight-of-hand doesn’t come close to anything the federal or state governments can “magically” accomplish, it simultaneously amuses and boggles the mind on a certain level. Council agreed to begin exploring where a new borough building should be constructed. Councilman Dibble reckoned that a borough building of approximately 1000 square feet, with a meeting room, an administrative office, an office for police, and two restrooms, as well as parking, will cost in the neighborhood of $50,000 to $60,000, exclusive of architectural fees and a number of other costs.

Council’s dream of a new municipal building in Oakland borough will, if realized, return meetings to the borough on a regular basis, rather than as the exception when Lanesboro Community Center is unavailable. But borough council’s action this evening is only the first affirmative step on a journey still amorphous and of undefined duration.

President Beavan metaphorically gaveled the meeting to close at 8:35 p.m. under the clear and cooling skies of Wilson Avenue. Barring unforeseen circumstances, Oakland Borough Council will next meet on the second Thursday of August in Lanesboro.

Commissioner Hall opened the meeting promptly at 9AM and Commissioners Warren and Giangrieco got right down to business with approval of the prior meetings minutes.

The following financial items were approved or ratified by the Commissioners: 6/26/13 for $64,961.09 for General Expenses; $161,772,59 for Net Payroll Expenses on 7/3/13; Employee Retirement Contributions of $15,122.12; $7,361.15 for State Withholding on 7/3/13; $62,096.01 for Federal Payroll taxes on 7/4/13; 7/2/13 for CYS expenses of $71,244.91; and 7/5/13 for $259,224.56 in General Expenses. Additionally, There were a number of seminar requests which were approved.

It was noted that no bids were received for the Transportation Vehicles. Commissioner Giangrieco made a motion and per the policy, the vehicles be sold for scrap value. Commissioner Warren seconded the motion, and the motion was passed.

The siding project at 88 Chenango Street was awarded to E. Shinn Home Remodeling of Springville for a cost of $19,300.00.

The Commissioners accepted the resignation of one County employee, the furlough of a second, and the transfer of a third to a different department.

A Purchase of Service Agreement between Susquehanna County Services for Children & Youth and Susquehanna House Inc., Jersey Shore for the following programs: Foster Care Certificate (Unit ID-AA) $69.00 per diem, (Unit ID-BB) at $89.00 per diem; Transitional Living Certificate #327780 at $79.00 per diem, #327790 at $89.00 per diem; Day Treatment at $13.00 per diem; and Residential Certificate at $99.00 per diem.

Nestor Resources, Inc. of Valencia PA submitted a proposal which was approved for revision and amendment of the Susquehanna County Municipal Waste Management Plan, Option 2. The total project cost will be $47,657.00 with 80% reimbursement from the Department of Environmental Protection, Act 101, Section 901 grant, and a County match. A proposal from Shumaker Consulting Engineering & Land Surveying, P.C. of Montrose was approved for the inspection of the three County dams for a total cost of $4,550.00.

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:08AM.

The Salary Board meeting was opened at 9:08AM. Commissioner Giangrieco was not in attendance for personal reasons and County Coroner Anthony Conarton, and Treasuerer Benedict were in attendance. The minutes of the 5/8/13 Salary Board meeting were approved. The Board approved a request by the County Coroner to create a non-union position of Administrative Assistant/Deputy Coroner. Their being no further business, the Salary Board meeting was adjourned at 9:12AM.

The Great Bend Borough Council called the meeting to order promptly at 7:00 p.m. After the Pledge of Allegiance, a moment of silence was called to honor the life of Officer Lomax. The Council then took their seats and began the business portion of the meeting by approving the agenda, the prior meeting minutes and the Treasurer's report. The floor was then opened for public comment and Mr. Crook took a moment to commend Officer Record for the wonderful job he did keeping all the information, communication, and emotions together and going during the challenging time around Officer Lomax's death.

The Roads and Parks Report moved swiftly as most issues are still ongoing and have not come to a full resolution. It was noted that the new pipes installed for the water runoff from Rt 81 may not be sufficient to deal with the quantity of water. This is going to be researched further. The Road projects on Mountain Vista Lane and Orchard Road are on hold currently. One bid was received for this work, but the Board had several questions regarding the scope and pricing and have asked for further clarifications before making a decision.

The Borough Council went into Executive Session to discuss some personnel issues and resumed the meeting with the Police report which involved 3 traffic citations, 7 warnings and 4 arrests. The End of Watch for Officer Lomax was reviewed, including the note on how many views there were to the Great Bend Police's Facebook page (53,682 views, up from several hundred). A Letter of Commendation for Officer Lomax was presented to the Mayor for signing. It detailed an event that happened several days prior to Officer Lomax's death, and was noted as being one example of the level of service that Officer Lomax provided to everyone he met.

Communications received involved PennDOT's Equipment show on July 25th, and the Endless Mountain Visitors Bureau seeking an annual request. The HGBJSA had submitted their budget for the upcoming fiscal year and it was noted that according to the information, there will be an increase, and that unless things change soon, another increase will be likely to occur next year as well. It was noted that the new blinds will not be purchased or installed until the painting is done and that is being scheduled for the fall. It was noted that the retirement account is in need of being liquidated due to the passing of Charles Martel. This will be undertaken by the Secretary and the Mayor. Adams Cable submitted a new franchise agreement. After review, it was determined that the Borough's lawyer should review it prior to any further actions being taken. Finally, Resolution 07-11-2013 was passed which appoints the Susquehanna County Council of Governments to administer and enforce the municipal floodplain ordinance.

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:36pm.

The latest maps, dated late last year, identify just over 57 miles of township roads in Harford. Hard to say how the question came up at the July meeting of the township Supervisors on the 9th. It may have been related to an effort to complete repairs under a program financed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency following flooding in 2011. The township will seek an extension on that funding because of delays on Jeffers and Oliver Roads.

It seems some computed the total miles for which the township is responsible at about 62, or was it 66 or 67? The latest state map shows 57 miles (including 13 miles of “turnback” roads, made over to the township by the state in past years). Some of the differences seem to be related to how the mileage is calculated. In other cases, small bits of road here and there have been declared abandoned. One person attending the meeting inquired about a small track on her farm. She was informed that she can have it back: it’s not part of the 57 official miles.

The Supervisors will be reviewing road maintenance expenditures to try to find some money for more calcium chloride for dust control in this wacky weather season. On the other hand, Supervisor Garry Foltz said of the companies involved in the natural gas industry, “we can’t thank them enough” for the work they have done on many of the township roads that take a beating from trucks and other heavy equipment servicing wellpads and building pipelines.

One of those wellpads will soon get a lot larger. Williams Field Services will meet soon with Township officials to discuss plans for a 28-acre expansion of the DeLucia site for a facility that will encompass 5 compressors and other apparatus to prepare gas for downstream transmission. With a permit from the state Department of Environmental Protection already in hand, under Act 14 of 1984 the company is obliged to inform affected municipalities and offer to discuss issues of concern. According to Mr. Foltz, the major issue of concern for Harford Township is that the roads the company plans to use for construction are too narrow (Plank to Grinnell to Miller); Mr. Foltz would prefer they use another route to the site (Stephens to Grinnell to Miller).

The Supervisors continue to pursue grants and other financial assistance for various projects, despite having just received $204,454.92 from the Act 13 “impact fees” for 2012. Asked what plans they might have for that money, the Supervisors said that the funds were deposited in a “capital reserve account.” Some of it was used to purchase a used Gradall for $11,500 to be used to improve ditches along the roads. Otherwise, Supervisor Doug Phelps said that no plans had yet been defined for the money.

Some $25,000 of the impact fee money last year was used to shore up the sewer system budget. Mr. Foltz is not inclined to do that again this year, even though the sewer budget continues to fall further behind. He said the impact-fee money should be used to benefit all residents of the township, not just the group served by the sewer system.

One reason the sewer finances are falling short is a substantial increase in legal fees associated with the township’s attempts to get sewer system fee-payer deadbeats to pay up. Some 10 properties are now covered by liens for delinquent payments. Seven of those are being processed for sheriff sale. Some of them already went through a process that scheduled payment plans, but most of those are again behind on the additional payments.

Delinquent sewer system subscribers are supposed to be charged for any legal expenses related to the collection process. Mr. Foltz wants to be sure that the full amount of fees charged by the township’s solicitors for collection purposes is added to the totals the delinquents already owe, perhaps for ultimate collection through foreclosure.

Mr. Foltz reported that new sewer pumps had been installed at the PennCan truckstop on the interstate. The commercial establishment is required to have 2 pumps, and one of them had failed. The township was able to find more pumps of the same type so that a major project to replace the pump basin would not be required, as was done at the Liberty truckstop across the way. The Liberty owners were assessed an additional 10 EDUs to cover the cost in that case. For the PennCan, although the cost to replace the pumps was less, the Supervisors decided to increase the EDU assessment anyway, to 25, the same number paid by Liberty.

The township has collected a little more money – about $300 – through the sale of some abandoned equipment. A small roller has been paid for and Mr. Foltz would like the buyer to come get it out of the yard.

The township could take a hit on a bridge on Lower Podunk Road, particularly if a fine is imposed for inadequate maintenance. Mr. Foltz announced that the Supervisors had met in executive session to discuss a legal question related to just that. Reilly Associates of Pittston reviewed the site and bridge inspection reports, but Mr. Foltz is wary of hiring engineers at this point. After the 2006 flooding Hawk Engineering submitted a bill for about $40,000 for studies related to 2 sites; the plan for the Stearns Road project was never used and Mr. Foltz doesn’t want to repeat that sort of mistake. The Supervisors have requested further information from the Northern Tier Planning Commission.

Asked for information on the slowdown in pipeline construction in the township, Mr. Foltz reported that the Harford Water Authority filed an action to halt construction until the company could come up with a plan to mitigate any damage or loss of water supply to the village occasioned by the project, which proposes to run a pipeline in back of the ballfield and potentially across the Water Authority’s lines from its reservoir. Lawyers are drafting an agreement that is supposed to guarantee trucked-in water in case supply to the village is interrupted.

That Authority also supplies water to most of the fire hydrants in the village. But the Authority’s reservoir holds only 16,000 gallons. So there is another hydrant that is supposed to be fed directly from Tyler Lake. Mr. Phelps, who is a member of the fire company, said that there are sufficient hoses to cover most of the village from that one hydrant if necessary. Trouble is, the hydrant doesn’t work. The question then arises, who is responsible for that hydrant, the Water Authority or the fire company? And is it supposed to be tested periodically? More important, when will it be repaired or replaced?

A project to divert excess water coming down the hill to Tyler Lake is awaiting a financing decision by the county Conservation District. Lisa Schmidt, who initiated the project and has been shepherding it through the paperwork process, said that a decision is expected soon. Mr. Foltz said that the delays were occasioned by “turmoil” at the county about jurisdiction over the Conservation District. The township will be expected to pay at least part of the cost once the grant is approved.

The annual “cleanup” in Harford to collect unwanted metals and other castoffs cost the township about $3,600. Supervisor and Secretary Sue Furney has not yet balanced the books for a final tally of income and expenses. Some of that cost was offset by sale of the metals; the rest should be covered by the $50 fee paid by property owners who took advantage of the program.

Wherever you are in the township, even 57 miles away at the end of some mildly beaten track in the Harford wilderness, you can make it to the next meeting, which should happen on Tuesday, August 13, 2013. Just find your way to a paved road, then to Route 547 just southwest of the interstate by 7:00pm.

New Milford borough combined its two July meetings, holding the combined meeting on the second Thursday due to the holiday on the first. The treasurer’s report was reviewed, as part of this it was stated that more earned income tax was coming in. One resident had contacted Berkheimer to state that they hadn’t received information on the tax and wanted to know who to pay.

Mr. White had spoken with Ron Kowalewski that day in regards to the Peck Hill drainage situation. The borough had a grant for the work, and it was confirmed that the grant was basically to restore the road to its pre-damage state. However, Mr. White and Mr. Kowalewski had some ideas as to how to work with the road in order to increase the drainage and make it more maintainable. The question being raised, then, was if the grant would be jeopardized if the borough went above and beyond the work outlined in it, even if it was paid for by the borough. Mr. White outlined the proposed plans. The changes, he opined, would make the road easier to maintain and possibly help defray erosion. It was suggested that without the additional work, they might need to work on it on a yearly basis. The grant was expired in September. It was decided that Ms. Hine was to call and investigate the matter. Mr. Ainey suggested that they ought to give the streets committee authorization to move forward, if it was responded that the additional work would be allowed. Ms. Gulick agreed that this was a good idea, given the tight timeline. The motion was made by Mr. Ainey and passed.

A visitor spoke up, stating that since Union Street had been paved the water flooded into her side yard and driveway. This also led to a need to chip ice out of the driveway. She requested that council look into it, and suggested that they could come and see the problem.

Mr. Ainey said, in relation to a mention of Act 13 monies, that the whole town had a drainage problem. Ms. Gulick suggested that they have a list for the following year, so that they were prepared.

A representative from Southwest Energy had come and met with borough representatives regarding the catch basin on Main Street. Their representative said that they had checked their records and their company hadn’t put a lot of traffic over it. However, he offered to go back to his supervisor and mention it. Southwest had then gotten back to them, stating that they would be willing to take care of the problem, hire a contractor, file the permits, etc. Since that time however there had been a problem with getting permits. The Mikichi Contracting Group was the company that got the bid to repair the catch basin. Ms. Hine had spoken with a gentleman from PennDot, who said that the borough had to apply for the permit. However, Southwest was the one actually doing the project. Southwest had engineers on staff, and it had been suggested that it would be smart for the borough to talk with them and ask if they could do some of the legwork. Ms. Hine reviewed some of the requirements, and Mr. White had been asked to contact Southwest to see if they would help. If they were willing to help, the borough would then only have to sign the contract. Ms. Gulick said that she didn’t understand why they had to apply to the state for a permit on a state road. Ms. Hine had contacted PennDot regarding when and where catchbasin responsibility had changed.

There were two bids which had been received in response to the crack and slurry sealing bid request. One person had only bid for crack sealing, though the borough wanted both. Vestal Asphalt bid for both, quoting $18,888.88. As they were the only company meeting the bid, theirs was accepted. There was some discussion regarding payment of the $8,888.88 above what the borough set aside for the project.

Ms. Gulick reported that the Planning Commission had met the night before and was prepared to go over the comprehensive plan with council at the August meeting.

A letter had been received regarding Parks and Recreation. Ms. Cosmello said she wanted to know why the Midtown Park wasn’t mowed for the Fourth of July. There was some discussion regarding the mowing of the borough’s parks. Mr. Carey did a lot of mowing and weed wacking on his own time. Mr. Ainey said that he didn’t think they would have much problem finding someone to pay to do the mowing and weed wacking. There was further discussion regarding this option. Mr. Ainey made a motion to authorize the personnel committee to review the matter in a week’s time and be given the authority to hire somebody if they so choose. It was clarified that the mowing was completed regularly but there was a desire for more attentive weed wacking.

Ms. Cosmello had met with Peter Quigg that day, and he wanted the park project to be in the new Community Foundation magazine. She gave everybody a print out of the donations. This list included the Wayne Susquehanna County Rescue, which had disbanded and gave the project the money in their checking account.

A phone call had been received regarding the Midtown Park, where the playground area was said to be in deplorable condition. Work to address this was planned.

The pool was open and in use, Sean Carey (the pool manager) reported. The pool was fully functioning, he continued. It was estimated that on a good day the pool saw a peak of 40 kids, though the bad days had very bad attendance. A few people had used the new lift. There were also two new picnic tables in the area now which were donated by the Endless Mountains Learning Center.

Mr. Ainey asked if there was any response regarding the doubling of the pool fee. It was responded that there didn’t appear to be any backlash.

The pool manager then spoke of swimming lessons. He had 11 kids signed up between July and August at that point, and needed 26 children to pay for the instructor’s wages. He proposed to council to postpone the July session and move everyone to August; with one session they would only need 13 children to break even. Council seemed to think that consolidating was the correct course.

It was stated that the police had been very present on the Fourth of July holiday.

Mr. Ainey said that council needed to start talking about the process to determine a reduction in millage rates in response to the earned income tax income. Council needed to determine what a mill of tax actually brought in, as opposed to what it was worth. It was hoped that such a reduction would occur.

Mr. White reported that within the next two weeks the cannon wheels were going to be completed. He also spoke of other work to be done to spruce up the cannon, which had been determined to be naval cannons from 1909.

Another visitor spoke up during the second public input section, looking for information on sidewalks. He wished to know who they belonged to, and how high they ought to be raised. He opined that there was no way disabled people who might live in the new housing development could walk on them. Ms. Gulick responded that the borough didn’t own the sidewalks, that the property owners were responsible for their own sidewalks. Council had looked for years for grant money to help property owners replace these. The borough had the ability to adopt an ordinance requiring sidewalks, and establishing standards for this. The question was where they would mandate sidewalks. The visitor said that he would have plenty of time to facilitate the project, and offered to help if they decided to put in grants. Council agreed that the sidewalks were bad. Ms. Gulick related that they were actively looking for grant money, and there was a committee who worked on this and similar topics.

DEEDS

Jerilyn Abbot (aka) Jerilyn Abbott King to Jerilyn Abbott King & Robert W. King, Jr., in Great Bend Borough, for $1.00.

John A. Frederici (by sheriff) to United States Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in Montrose, for $1,882.33.

Mark & Ronald J. Powers to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Bridgewater Twp., for $1.00.

Mark & Ronald J. Powers to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Auburn Twp., for $1.00.

Mark & Ronald J. Powers to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Auburn Twp., for $1.00.

Fiondi Inc. to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Middletown Twp., for $1.00.

Fiondi Inc. to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Jessup Twp., for $1.00.

Fiondi Inc. to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Middletown Twp., for $1.00.

Fiondi Inc. to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Forest Lake Twp., for $1.00.

Fiondi Inc. to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Silver Lake Twp., for $1.00.

Mark & Ronald J. Powers to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Apolacon & Choconut Twps., for $1.00.

Mark & Ronald J. Powers to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Forest Lake Twp., for $1.00.

Fiondi Inc to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Rush Twp., for $1.00.

Robert H. & Betty E. Hummell to Douglas J. Cooper, in Dimock Twp., for $100,000.00.

Mark & Ronald J. Powers to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Forest Lake Twp., for $1.00.

Mark & Ronald J. Powers to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Forest Lake Twp., for $1.00.

Mark & Ronald J. Powers to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Forest Lake Twp., for $1.00.

Mark & Ronald J. Powers to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Silver Lake Twp., for $1.00.

Mark & Ronald J. Powers to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Forest Lake Twp., for $1.00.

Mark & Ronald J. Powers to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Middletown Twp., for $1.00.

Mark & Ronald J. Powers to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Rush Twp., for $1.00.

Fiondi Inc to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Forest Lake Twp. & Middletown Twp., for $1.00.

Mark & Ronald J. Powers to Powers & Powers Family Limited Partnership, in Middletown Twp., for $1.00.

Jacob Adlai Kaplan (trust by trustee) to Jacob A. Kaplan, in Herrick Township, for $1.00.

Stephen L. Anderson to Bucky E. Beaver & Christina I. Cook, in Auburn Twp., for $219,000.00.

Carol W. Saunders to Mark S. Banyas, in Lenox Twp., for $162,000.00.

Ruth M. Mclaud (estate) to Kevin R. & Julie B. Cresswell, in Rush Twp., for $1.00.

Linda R. & John W. Ketchur to Richard F. Naylor Sr., Gloria F. Naylor & Clement W. Naylor Sr., in Hallstead Borough, for $85,000.00.

JGPD Inc. to William J. & Frances Heim, in Auburn Twp., for $900,000.00.

Rosemary A. Wilcox to Mark Wilcox, in Clifford Twp., for $1.00.

Eleanor E. Caterson (estate) to Price & Company LLC, in Montrose, for $60,000.00.

Patricia Delousia (aka) Patricia L. Delousia to Michael J. & Emily S. Hegedus, in Silver Lake Twp., for $1.00.

Paul & Tammy Organisciak to Naomi Stoltzfus, in Bridgewater Twp., for $103,500.00.

Thomas R. & Anne A. Dooley to Thomas R. & Anne A. Dooley (trust), in Jackson Twp., for $1.00.

Gerald R. Thorne, Rose Thorn (aka) Rose M. Thorne to Rose M. & Gerald R. Thorne (trust), in Apolacon Twp., for $1.00.

Lawrence & Donna Holbrook to Rock Ledge Resources LP, in Bridgewater Twp., for $1.00.

Lawrence R. & Donna M. Holbrook to Rock Ledge Resources LP, in Bridgewater Twp., for $1.00.

Summers Living Trust (by trustee) to Daniel Summers, in Choconut Twp., for $1.00.

Eric J. & Mary C. Wheaton to Eric J. Wheaton, in Bridgewater Twp., for $1.00.

David M. Jordan to David M. Jordan, in Franklin Twp., for $1.00.

Doris T. Vancott to Marvin B. & Carlene R. Vancott, in New Milford Twp., for $1.00.

Doris T. Vancott to Bonnie L. Vancott, in New Milford Twp., for $1.00.

Doris T. Vancott to Andrew J. & Stacey Park, in New Milford Twp., for $1.00.

Andrew J. Park (by atty) & Stacey Park to Doris T. Vancott, in New Milford Twp., for $1.00.

Doris T. Vancott to William J. Vancott, in New Milford Twp., for $1.00.

Charles S. C. Barnes & Beatriz R. Barnes to Curtis L. & Sheri L. Fullom, in Ararat Twp., for $331,000.00.

Lisa F. Johnson, Carol R. Kanuk (estate) & Anthony M. Kanuk to James Lai, in Middletown Twp., for $75,000.00.

Jeffrey Wilkowski & Kathleen Brennan to Jeffrey Wilkowski, in Lenox Twp., for $10.00.

Joseph & Christy Eger to Zana R. Cina, in Susquehanna, for $24,500.00.

Earle G. Gumaer to Samuel Allen Phillips, in Harford Twp., for $1.00.

Anna Stratford Pieniazek (estate aka) Ann Pieniazek (estate) & Maryclaire Bonds to Charles & June Arrowsmith, in Forest City, for $20,000.00.

Charles & June Arrowsmith to Renee M. Kase, in Forest City, for $20,000.00.

W Alan Merz, Suzanne R. Blessing, Carla J. Obannon & Ronald S. Merz to Merz Family Partnership LP, in Auburn Twp., for $1.00.

W Alan Merz, Suzanne R. Blessing, Carla J. Obannon & Ronald S. Merz to Merz Family Partnership LP, in Auburn Twp., for $1.00.

Paulette C. Banford to Robert Delucia & Paulette C. Banford, in Lenox Twp., for $1.00.

Edward T. & Beverly J. Scott to Edward T. & Beverly J. Scott, in New Milford Twp., for $1.00.

Barbara Schlasta to Barbara Schlasta in Gibson Twp., for $1.00.

Jean Loomis to Jeffrey Loomis & Chrisann Loomis Rowe, in Bridgewater Twp., for $1.00.

Charles M. & Regina M. Pierson to John Pierson, in Rush Twp., for $1.00.

Doris Folk (by atty) to Andrew & Joelle Napolitano, in Susquehanna, for $77,000.00.

Earl D. Raub Jr. & Lori Ann Raub to ZLZ Farm Resources LP, in Liberty Twp., for $1.00.

Earl D. Raub Jr. & Lori Ann Raub to ZLZ Farm Resources LP, in Liberty Twp., for $1.00.

Joel D. & Kellie M. Trotter to Bradley R. & Desiree J. Stone, in Clifford Twp., for $166,000.00.

Fannie Mae (aka by poa) Federal National Mortgage Association (by poa) to Joseph Mastropole, in Forest City, for $11,500.00.

Sharon M. Anthony to Sharon M. Anthony & Anthony Living Trust, in Auburn Twp., for $1.00.

Norman W. Millard (estate aka) Norman William Millard (estate) to Dennis S. & Denise Millard, in Bridgewater Twp., for $116,960.26.

James G. Bralla (trust by trustee) & Martha Jane Ballard to Andrew R. & Tracy L. Whitehead, in Jackson Twp., for $550,000.00.

Edmund Urbas (estate) & Carl Urbas Jr. to Joseph Winans, in Forest City, for $74,000.00.

Andrew & Sophie Onufrak (trust by trustee) to Sonia O. Jennings, in Gibson Twp., for $1.00.

Theresa H. Voige to Valerie A. Voige & Marianne P. Meyer, in Jessup Township & Bridgewater Twp., for $1.00.

Dennis O. Overfield to Dennis O. Overfield (trust), in Bridgewater Twp., for $1.00.

Michael & Diane Laytos to Ryan M. Traver, in Springville Twp., for $117,000.00.

Bank of New York Mellon to Bear Creek Properties, in Bridgewater Twp., for $100,100.00.

Clara R. Ward (by atty) to Ronald & Amy Natterer, in Brooklyn Twp., for $1.00.

Charlotte Ann Mason (estate aka) Charlotte Mason (estate) & Eldercare Solutions Inc. to Blake A. & Andrew J. Kelly, in Apolacon Twp., for $37,900.00.

Ruth Y. Casterline to Nathan R. Coleman, in Little Meadows Borough, for $151,410.00.

Lura & Anthony J. Colinet to Francis & Mandy S. Marshall, in Dimock Twp., for $169,500.00.

Keith R. & Sandra J. Lord to Gerald & Sandra Neild, in Liberty Twp., for $169,000.00.

Mark C. McCarey to Deborah A. & Burton E. Miller, in Springville Twp., for $45,000.00.

BENCH WARRANTS

The Susquehanna County DOMESTIC RELATIONS Section has outstanding BENCH WARRANT’S for the following individuals as of 00:00 a.m. on July 12, 2013: Thomas D. Earley, Jesse J Fenton, David J. Fischer, Douglas R. Heath, James Karhnak, Kay L. Knolles, Whade A. Koch, Jean M. Larson, Todd J. Layton, Charlie J. Legere, Frank T. Perera II, Mary Perschau, Bruce A. Schurr, Desiree L. Shifler, David J. Shiner, Eric J. Snell, Earl H. Thompson, Jr, Steven G. Warner, Roger D. Williams, Please contact the Domestic Relations Section at 570-278-4600 ext. 170 with any information on the location of these individuals.

Alarm/Security: On 06/05/13 Silver Lake Township Police responded to an alarm on Russell Road in Silver Lake Township. Officer Tiffany was the responding officer.

Animal Complaint: On 06/06/13 Silver Lake Township Police responded to an animal complaint located on the Quaker Lake Road. Some cows had broken a fence at a farmer’s house and were roaming the hillside at the Silver Lake Field Day grounds. Officer Tiffany located the owner of the cows and they were returned safely.

Domestic Dispute: On 06/18/13 Montrose Police Department requested assistance from Silver Lake Township Police for a domestic located on State Route 267 in Forest Lake Township. Chief Burgh was the responding officer. This case is still under investigation.

Criminal Mischief: On 06/09/13 a resident located on Lake Sophia Road reported that their yard had been damaged by some type of vehicle. The actors did circles in the yard causing a lot of damage. It was determined that ATV’s were used in this incident. Chief Burgh was the responding officer. This case is still under investigation.

Traffic Stop/Drugs: On 06/21/13 at 10:40 p.m. Silver Lake Township Police were conducting speed enforcement on State Route 4002. A vehicle was stopped for speeding and the driver was found with a small amount of marijuana on his person. Chief Burgh was the responding officers.

Suspicious Vehicle: On 06/13/13 two people were reported to be in the driveway of a township resident. The individuals remained in the driveway for a period of time until the owner of the house approached them. The individuals then left the scene. Chief Timothy Burgh was the responding officer. This case is still under investigation.

Traffic Stop/Drugs: On 06/21/13 while conducting speed enforcement a vehicle was stopped for speeding on the Quaker Lake Road. The driver was issued a citation and after the citation was issued a consent search was obtained. The driver had marijuana in the vehicle. The driver was on probation and was charged with the possession of the small amount. Chief Burgh and Officer Sprout were the responding officers. This case is still under investigation.

911 hang up: On 06/03/13 Silver Lake Township Police responded to a 911 hang up call located at Timberline Camp Ground. It was determined that while a camper was being placed a phone line was broken. Chief Burgh was the responding officer.

Harassment by Communication: On 06/13/13 a resident located on State Route 167 stated he had received a phone call telling him that his grandson needed money. The resident stated that someone called him and told him that his grandson was in jail in a foreign country and that the resident needed to send money to get him out. The individual knew this was a scam and notified police immediately. Chief Timothy Burgh was the responding officer.

Erratic Driving: On 06/01/13 and 06/17/13 two separate incidents were reported of erratic driving. One report was speeding on Barney Road at various times of the day. The other report was on the Quaker Lake Road where a vehicle was passing cars on a curve on several different occasions. Chief Burgh took the reports.

Assist Other Agency: On 06/22/13 while in Montrose Borough a vehicle swerved toward our Patrol Vehicle at the intersection of State Route 706 and Owego Street. As we followed the vehicle it moved in and out of its lane several times. Montrose Police were notified and a traffic stop was conducted. The driver was arrested for suspicion of D.U.I. And possession of marijuana. The passenger was released. Officer Tiffany (M.P.D.) was the arresting officer with Chief Burgh and Officer Sprout assisting. This case is still under investigation.

Medical Calls: Silver Lake Township Police responded to one medical call this month.

Silver Lake Township Police will be conducting multiple traffic stops with strict enforcement throughout the month of July. Drivers should be aware that speed limits will be more strictly enforced with maximum fines being imposed. As you drive through our township please note the speed limit changes in various areas. Quaker Lake has a 25mph zone for approximately 1 mile while driving around the Lake. Most township Roads are 25mph speed limits and all State Roads in the township are posted 35mph with the exception of State Route 4002 on Quaker Lake. There is a road closure near the intersection of Valley View Road and the Laurel Lake Road. It is undetermined when this part of the roadway will reopen.

Silver Lake Township Police remind all ATV riders of the following laws. Your ATV can not be driven upon any roadways in the township. You are allowed to cross a roadway but not ride on the roadway (This includes dirt roads) you will be cited if caught driving on the roadway. Helmets must be worn at all times; ATV must be registered and insured. You are not allowed to go onto other people’s property without their permission and proof of insurance and registration. ATV riders that consume alcohol and are caught on the roadway will be arrested for D.U.I. The department wants you to have a safe and happy riding experience. If you are caught breaking these laws you will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Fines could reach up to $2000.00 for one incident.

Any information or questions for Silver Lake Township Police, please call 570-278-6818 or email us at silverlaketwppd@epix.net, all information will be held strictly confidential. You can look at the Silver Lake Township Website at www.silverlaketwp.org, to see all Silver Lake Townships' news, profiles, and resources, including the police reports. Monthly Township meetings are held the first Monday of every month at 7p.m. at the Silver Lake Township Municipal Building. The police department welcomes you to attend to address any questions, concerns, or complaints that you may have concerning the police department.