Though school was over, the June 11th meeting of the Montrose school board was filled with students. The reasoning behind this was a list of good things, and students who were to be recognized for them.

Jacob Myers was named to All-State Chorus and All-Eastern Chorus, it was stated. This was his third year receiving the honor, but he was unable to attend the meeting due to a conflict.

Mrs. Suzanne Bennici then stood to speak, to note three students who had been nominated to All-State Wind Ensemble. These included Nicholas Best, Mollie Host, and Jacob Kerbaugh.

The school had an outstanding student newspaper, Mr. Ognosky said, and had for over ten years. The paper, he explained, continually won awards, and he felt it was neat when student accomplishments could transcend the instructor. The students' efforts had transitioned through a change in educator, which he felt spoke highly of them. Ms. Freethy, the current advisor of the group, stood up then and introduced her editors. The students recognized that evening included Courtney Kimmel, Callie Curley, Kayleah Trecoske, Nicki Lewis, Erica Reeves, Meghan Spellman, and Briana Johnson, who followed the standard hand shake and certificate protocol. Nicki Lewis had also received an honor for an outstanding sports article.

Mr. Ognosky then read aloud a thank you note which had been received from Joni Host, the Ray Kroc award recipient recognized at the previous month's meeting.

The final documentation for the junior senior high project from 1995, was to be closed out. This would allow a permanent percentage for reimbursement to be determined, rather than the temporary reimbursement which the district had been receiving for many years.

In the last state audit, Mr. Ognosky explained, there were two state findings, one in favor of the district which brought a reimbursement, and the other involving an improper reporting for a retired administrator. The latter had been rectified; both findings had been addressed.

A contract was approved with First Energy Solutions providing reduced electric rates through 2015, May. The district already had a contract with the company through 2013, and as part of that contract was able to look at rates and extend the contract under a new rate.

Regular lunch prices at both the elementary and secondary levels were increased from $1.75 to $1.85 per lunch, effective with the oncoming year. Five cents of this increase was mandatory it was said. The lunch program was self-sustaining Mr. Caterson reminded those present; the tax payers did not pay for the program under normal circumstances. It was the first time the district had raised prices in years, Mr. Ognosky asserted.

The first readings of several policies were approved. Mr. Ognosky explained these. The concussion management policy was a big deal, he stated. The Youth and Sports Act had been passed by the General Assembly, placing an emphasis on traumatic brain injury. This policy was a very clear policy as to what the district had to do when an athlete was removed from a competition and was exhibiting signs of a concussion. It stipulated when the student could return to play, and what must be done for this to happen. The policy was very punitive regarding a coach who did not follow the policy. The policy was also specific in the district's responsibility to provide to the parents and the student information on concussions and traumatic brain injury. This policy in turn created a change in the extracurricular activities and the interscholastic athletics policies. Both of these required the signature of the concussion and traumatic brain injury information sheet as part of the physical process. Mrs. Staats suggested that this might be coming from research suggesting that the second concussion was where problems were run into. Every coach was required to take a 30 minute video training, which involved a question and answer segment. Everyone who coached for the district now had to pass this training and receive a certificate. Also a grant had been received through Dick's Sporting goods which would allow a company to come in and take a baseline neurological image of the students.

The supplemental disciplinary records policy clarified that these records were not required to transfer with a student. Many districts request these records, and many districts refuse to release them.

As the board was approving summer school instructors, Mr. Ognosky announced that this was probably the last year the district would offer a summer school. The failure rate at the high school had been significantly lower over the last two years than it had been in the past. In response to a question, it was stated that the online courses were much more expensive, and difficult to pass, though this instructional method was used.

A special public meeting of the board was scheduled for Thursday June 28 to vote on a final budget and conduct end of the year fiscal business.

During the administrator's reports, Mr. Tallarico, in abstentia, commended various sports teams, and called the final two weeks of school, including graduation, a success.

The budget was not passed, and was not to be passed until June 28th. This meant that the district would not be able to give information to the company who printed the tax bills until June 29th, after which it usually took about 3 weeks to get back to the district. The tax bills would not, then, be received by July 2nd or 3rd, as had been recently occurring. The early discount would still be August 23rd.

Mr. Adams spoke about the end of the year and preparations for summer camp. Camp was slated to start shortly after the holiday. Mr. Adams said that he thought it was one of the best programs that had been done. Some reductions had to be followed through, including having a math and reading instructor only two days each at the camp rather than both having four days. Mr. McComb also spoke about the hectic nature of the end of the year. Both principals regaled the board and administration with tales of transportation difficulties during the sixth grade school trips.

Having a meeting on June 28th, it was suggested that perhaps the board would not have to meet in July this year. No official decision was made that evening.

Mr. Ognosky gave an update on the budget status. Without any movement by the state legislature, and without taking money from the fund balance, and without raising the tax base, the district sat at that time with a deficit just under $291,000 total. Mr. Ognosky said that he was very confident that by the second board meeting they would have a budget.

Mr. Gow said that once again, the kids showed how mature they had become at graduation. The speeches were also commendable, he felt. There was some discussion regarding a student who had been in a motorcycle accident at the beginning of the year. Being able to graduate with his class was called an inspiration. The students recognition of him was also spoken of favorably. Mr. Caterson spoke too about how well the audience had behaved itself.

The implication wasn’t emphasized, but when Supervisor Garry Foltz said “I don’t see the money to do this,” his colleague Doug Phelps could only respond, “rates are going to have to go up.” At that, the Supervisors, who double as the Harford Township Sewer System, agreed to an ordinance that will allow them to borrow $150,000 for renovations to the sewer plant, which is now almost 20 years old.

At their meeting on June 12th, the Supervisors also agreed to an ordinance to support a loan from Peoples Neighborhood Bank that refinances the remaining balance of just under $650,000 on the original note that paid for construction of the sewer system way back then. They also accepted and signed a commitment letter that was overlooked by the bank a couple months ago.

The commitment letter for the second loan from Peoples for the renovation project will await final formal approval of the pair of ordinances at a special meeting on June 28.

The larger loan carries a 3.25% interest rate for the first year, capped at 4.5% thereafter at 75% of prime for a period of 20 years and 8 months. The second note starts at 3% for 3 years, reviewed every 3 years for 15 years at 68% of prime and capped at 4.75%.

Mr. Foltz said that the larger loan is already accounted for in the township budget. However, while he said that the township’s engineers and solicitor had agreed that “we have the money to do the [renovation] project,” with potential annual revenue of over $120,000, unfortunately that doesn’t account for delinquencies; some sewer accounts have been in arrears for years. So one purpose of the meeting on June 28 will be to figure out how to collect that money. Harford’s rate per EDU remained at the original $32 for the first 12 or so years since the system was built, boosted only twice since then, most recently by $3 to the current $38 per month, still among the lowest in the area.

In other matters, Mr. Phelps provided a sheaf of road-crossing agreements from Williams Oil, mostly for pipeline construction in various areas of the township. He also reported that the annual “cleanup” was successful. Supervisor and township Secretary Sue Furney said the crew collected 36 loads. Mr. Phelps said that the township’s “citizens were very pleased” with the program.

The township also received word from the Susquehanna County Conservation District of a “debris removal program” being offered. The township is invited to nominate streams blocked by downed trees that would be cleared under special dispensation from the state Department of Environmental Protection. The program will not clear shifted gravel beds, however, and Mr. Foltz invites residents to identify streams that might benefit from clearing – as long as it doesn’t cost the township any money.

Mr. Foltz led a mid-year review of the budget, noting that revenue from the earned income tax (EIT) doesn’t seem to be keeping pace, having collected just $35,000 of the estimated $110,000 that is due. Ms. Furney said that Act 32 changes that focused such tax collections at the county level were taking some time to work out, but that her contacts said that collections should catch up by year’s end. The budget item for major equipment is already overspent by more than $10,000; Ms. Furney said the difference was the down payment on the new truck.

The special meeting on June 28 will focus on sewer issues and ordinances, but is also designated for general purposes, should other matters come before the Supervisors. The meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m. at the township building.

“The town is a lot quieter.” So said member Pat Thatcher following Jon Record’s police report at the Great Bend Borough Council meeting on June 7th. Mr. Record, Officer in Charge of the Borough’s fledgling Police department reported a relatively quiet month of May. His officers logged 107 hours altogether, including 5 traffic warnings, 6 traffic citations and 7 incidents called in. There was also a crash on private property which was not reportable. And officers made one arrest, on a bench warrant.

24 of those hours were for training, for 3 new officers officially appointed at the meeting (selected at a special meeting on May 14th). They are J. J. Lomax, Robert Bastek, and Thomas Sheehan. They will be paid at the rate of $10 per hour. Look for them and say Hi.

With summer coming on, Mr. Record asked Council for their position on fireworks. Under state law, the local municipality must sign off on applications to display incendiaries, and hold a $500 deposit. According to Council Chairman Rick Franks, the Borough didn’t approve any such applications last year, and didn’t plan on doing so this year. Council member Jerry MacConnell seemed to expect Mr. Record’s troops to enforce the law, but “within reason,” as he said.

Mr. Record was also told that the Borough has no burn ordinance, although the state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) does prohibit the burning of particularly noxious materials such as plastic and tires.

He was also told that the Borough has no curfew ordinance, but he said that he would be asking for one, to enable officers to stop youngsters after hours and “get them home.”

Mr. Record was also given permission to look for new tires for the police car, at $100 apiece. He will be doing that within a month. Otherwise, he has bought $96 worth of office supplies, and a couple new badges. Borough Mayor Jim Riecke asked Borough Secretary Sheila Guinan to try to aggregate expenditures on the Police Department in her treasurer’s reports so that council can better keep track of the department’s budget.

Council member Mike VanGorden asked Mr. Record if he would be permitted to respond in case of, say, an altercation during a fire department call outside the borough, perhaps in Hallstead or in the township. Mr. Record said that in general, his officers could act in such cases only when called out by the State Police.

In other matters, Council voted to take out a loan for $80,000 from Peoples Neighborhood Bank at an adjustable rate for 5 years. The interest rate will start at 2.75% and be capped at 4.75%. The money, along with another $16,000 or so from the streets fund, will be used for the paving project on Washington, Church and Hayes Streets.

Council will also be looking for bids to apply sealer to the rest of the town’s streets this summer. They would like the bids broken down by street so they can determine just how much they can afford to do in one budget year.

Mr. VanGorden asked that residents who have a problem with whatever maintenance employee Dick Button is doing around town take their comments to the Borough Council rather than confronting Mr. Button directly.

Council expressed some chagrin at the condition of Veterans of Foreign Wars (Recreation) Park. The VFW had said that the condition of the park’s entrance would be improved by Spring. Yet Mr. Franks declared the condition of the park as a whole “a mess.” Council heard that the Little League is using the ballfield there, but otherwise the park is in poor condition. Council perused some catalogs of park equipment and agreed to purchase 4 new grills, to be distributed between VFW and Greenwood Parks.

On the other hand, Mayor Riecke, as is his wont, thanked the VFW for their sponsorship of Memorial Day events in town.

The next scheduled meeting of the Great Bend Borough Council will be on Thursday, July 5, 2012, beginning at 7:00pm. All meetings are held in the Borough Building at Elizabeth & Franklin Streets (aka the Blue Ridge Senior Center).

It won’t be fast. It won’t include the sum and substance of public comment, or the names of those who made those comments. It won’t include deliberative discussions, if past is prologue. And it won’t include the agendas, either prospective or approved, since county commissioners don’t actually approve agendas. But make no mistake about it, approved minutes of county commissioner meetings are on their way to the county’s website. That concession to open and transparent government was made by Chairman Alan Hall at the Commissioners’ Meeting of Wednesday, June 13.

Commissioners Alan Hall, Michael Giangrieco, and Mary Ann Warren met from 9 to 9:21 in the Commissioners’ Meeting Room of the Courthouse. The unusually long meeting, by commissioner standards, was lengthened by a long public comment period. Also, with three weeks since the previous commissioners’ meeting, commissioners’ had a full plate of issues to devour. Like entrants in a pie-eating contest, they were up to the challenge and bolted their fare full-speed, slowed only by occasional questions from a meeting attendee.

Commissioners awarded Employee Years of Service Recognition (Five-Year Incremental Anniversaries) to Roberta Collins - Domestic Relations - 10 Years; Nicholas Conigliaro - Warden - 10 Years; Stacey Phillips - Sheriff’s Office - 20 Years. Also recognized, but not present to accept their awards were Michael Koscelnak - Probation - 15 years; and James Gulbin - Probation - 20 years.

With employee recognition awards completed, commissioners began their sprint through the agenda. Commissioner Giangrieco motioned to approve all even-numbered items six though 18 on the agenda; Commissioner Warren odd-numbered items seven through 17. Each provided the required second for the other, and all items were passed without dissent or abstention. Included among those items were two resolutions.

Resolution 2012-10 provided Policy and Procedure for Engineering Consultant Selection. With the county’s current engineering consultant contract expiring on Dec. 31, 2012, state law necessitated that the county set forth the criteria for the selection of a successor at this stage of the process.

Resolution 2012-11 is a “Resolution Authorizing the Revision of the County’s FFY 2010 Community Development Block Grant Program” (CDBG). This resolution was necessitated because “. . . the County wishes to revise its FFY 2010 Program by transferring $12,000 previously approved for demolition of a property located in Thompson Borough to assist with completion of a pre-approved demolition activity in the Borough of Forest City.” Resolution passage granted authorization for the aforementioned revision.

Motions approved by commissioners included approval of seminar requests for 28 county employees, at a cost to the county of $30.40, excluding the cost of fuel for the county vehicle for Art Donato’s “PEMA - The Next Generation 9-1-1” seminar in Harrisburg on June 19. Since only scant amounts come out of county coffers, one wonders how much State and Federal taxpayers have to cough up for the vast assortment of seminars that are, no doubt, mandated by the State and/or Federal governments. County taxpayers might wish to look in a mirror to see who those State and Federal taxpayers are.

In other money matters, Commissioners ratified expenditure, payroll, and tax withholding for the county government to the tune of $1.051 million for the two-week period May 23 through June 7. Another motion authorized the commissioners to ratify the signing of the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement between the state and county. The total cost of the Mitigation Project amounts to $29,432 and is identified as Round I of the Buyout Program for Tropical Storm Lee.

Other “money motions” dealt with a variety of issues. One exonerated taxes on a dismantled trailer formerly located in a trailer park in Clifford Township. Another increased board/allowance rates for Foster Care, effective July 1, 2012, in nine out of 10 classifications, at rates ranging from 18% to over 66%. While the Federal Government’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) barely recognizes inflation, the foster care increases authorized by commissioners evidently aren’t attempting to mask the Fed’s debauching of our money supply.

Personnel actions included the appointment of “James Kessler, Franklin Township, to the Susquehanna County Conservation District Board as a Public Director for the unexpired term June 13, 2012 through December 31, 2012.” Commissioners also acknowledged “the hiring of Michael Harlost, Hop Bottom, by Mary Evans, Register & Recorder, to the open, temporary, part-time summer clerical position in the Register & Recorder’s Office, Range 5, Rate $7.25 per hour, plus the current year increase once it is determined, effective June 4, 2012.”

Other miscellaneous motions were passed, along with a lease agreement between the county and Trehab, authorizing the county to lease 19 vehicles to Trehab for the grand sum of $1.00 per vehicle for the period July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. Those vehicles will be used for Shared Ride and Medical Assistance Transportation. Trehab assumes responsibility for all maintenance, repairs, inspections, and insurance.

During public comment, this reporter asked several questions. I reminded Chairman Hall of his statement back in February that this was just one-thirty-fifth of the meetings he attended, and I asked if he could provide reports of those meetings, in written or oral form, at this meeting. His answer was a tepidly positive response; but any information sharing on other meetings is for the future, not today‘s.

My second question regarded the posting of meeting minutes and agendas online at the county’s website. Chairman Hall firmly stated that posting of approved minutes was in the works, and that it should be accomplished in the next few days. Posting of the agenda of upcoming meetings or unapproved minutes (those to be approved at the next meeting) will not happen. Online gentle readers wishing to check on the County’s success in getting the May 23 minutes posted may do so by going to the county’s website at www.susqco.com. Success means readers will be able to access the minutes of the commissioners’ May 23 meeting, not the June 13 meeting. June 13 minutes will not be approved before the next commissioners’ meeting on June 27, so it is only on or after June 27 that June 13 minutes will be posted and available online at the county’s website.

Following my questions, Susquehanna County resident Bruce Paskoff spoke. His testimony, in part, is as follows. “In going back and forth, my contention was, and I’ve spoken to people on the Committee for Open Government, who are incredulous, that there is nothing included in the minutes from those who stand up, those who speak at a meeting, from the public, that there’s nothing included. They are also incredulous that there is nothing included from the back-and-forth between commissioners on how you make a decision. So we went through this again. Three times we went through this. And what it boils down to is that the attorney has given you the power to decide what public testimony is. Yet, you yourself, and the attorney, refuse, or are unable, to define testimony. Therefore, whatever the public says is determined at that moment by the commissioners even though you can’t distinguish what it is. I find that - I find it Orwellian that people come to a meeting and are given the right to speak, and the exact words are, ‘people who appear officially.’ Well if they’re not signed in, they’re not official. And if they speak on a subject that you can’t define, whether its testimony or not, they’re also not included. And for four years, and this is going on six months, nothing has appeared under ‘public comment,’ whether it is from the commissioners, or from the public. So I say to you, ‘My contention is you are still violating the Sunshine Law. You are excluding the public from the process. This is a two-way street. You serve because you were elected. You serve by the consent of the people. The people have the right to speak and to be heard. It’s supposed to be written down so there IS a record. There Is No Record! . . . ”

Chairman Hall, without engaging or directly addressing anything that Mr. Paskoff had said over the past three minutes, thanked him for his comment, then inquired if there was any other comments. Robert McNamara asked to come forward to present the commissioners with a volunteer recognition in the form of a ceremonial faux check in the amount of $842,466.00, representing an estimated 39,441 hours of community service provided by retired school employees in the Susquehanna County Chapter of the Pennsylvania Association of School Retirees (PASR). Mr. McNamara explained that school retirees perform a multitude of vital services throughout our county, including as emergency responders, firefighters, and political action committees. Commissioners thanked Mr. McNamara and the PASR for their service and expressed their appreciation.

The meeting adjourned at 9:21. Interested readers will, according to Chairman Hall, soon have the ability to access approved minutes online at the county’s website. According to some critics, those minutes are sterile and sterilized, and what they do not impart says more about the county’s openness than their new-found online availability. County residents will be the ultimate king-makers in deciding if they are now satisfied or wish to press for further transparency.

Commissioners meet on June 27 for their next regular meeting.

A short-handed Oakland boro council waited five extra minutes to marshal every available councilman for Thursday, June 14’s meeting at the Lanesboro Community Center. At 7:05 p.m. Council President Ron Beavan called the meeting to order with fellow councilmen Dave Dibble, Brian Rhone, and Dave Trevarthan, and Jack Agler present. Also present were Mayor Randy Glover and Secretary/Treasurer Flo Brush. Absent were Councilmen Gary Boughton and Tom Kubus.

The minutes of council’s May 10 meeting were approved with two minor corrections. Council then approved the Treasurer’s Report and time sheets. That brought council to the Codes Report on the meeting’s agenda. President Beavan reported on the status of four properties under the watchful eye of Code Enforcement Officer (CEO) Shane Lewis. Two State Street properties were on that list, with one now in compliance and the other having been settled on the legal basis of not being a legally registered business and subject to the resultant consequences. A third property on Prospect Street is also now in compliance, while late-breaking reports indicated that the fourth property, on Wilson Street, harbors two hobby cars and two additional unregistered cars. CEO Lewis will be instructed to intensify monitoring of that property-owner and take actions to ensure compliance.

President Beavan called on Mr. Trevarthan for the Parks Report. Mr. Trevarthan’s report was “Nothing new,” to which Mayor Glover and President Beavan took umbrage. “Something should be going on; this is summertime,” said Mayor Glover. President Beavan noted that he had not seen a Treasurer’s Report from the Parks Committee in quite sometime. While a monthly report isn’t necessary, a quarterly Treasurer’s Report would be expected. President Beavan continued, “How can council help, Dave?” Mr. Trevarthan replied, “Send me volunteers; I need volunteers.” With that, council proceeded on a discussion favoring a volunteer drive. It was suggested that perhaps families with youngsters in the boro would be interested in getting involved. Also discussed was the need for another clean-up at the park. With a sudden downturn in Scout membership this year, there are far fewer youths to count on, and councilmen noted that so many youths are wrapped up in sports activities. Discussions of park mowing and weed-whacking proceeded to determine who was responsible for those tasks. Finally, Councilman Rhone made a motion, seconded by Councilman Agler, to NOT carry insurance on the dugout at the park. That motion, unanimously approved, put to rest two months of discussion on the dugout issue.

Mayor Glover delivered high praise for Chief Sweet, and Oakland and Susquehanna Police Departments for the recent major drug bust at a State Street residence. Mayor Glover outlined the in-depth investigation to successfully gather evidence for a warrant and crack the case wide open with the cooperation of Susquehanna Boro‘s police department. He also mentioned the side benefit that the boro will file the necessary documents to take possession of the drug dealer’s ill-gotten gains. Mayor and councilmen mentioned the recent influx of strangers into the boro. Whereas residents knew most everyone in the boro as recently as a few years ago, the same cannot be said today. President Beavan noted that not so many years ago people would say they didn’t think the boro needed a police department. He said he doesn’t hear those comments any more. People realize just how important it is to have a local police force.

The Mayor’s Police Report showed 26 police responses in May: Burglary Alarm - 1; Domestic Dispute - 2; PFA Protective Order - 3; Criminal Trespass - 2; Suspicious Person - 1; Suspicious Vehicle - 1; Disorderly Conduct - 1; Other Assault - 1; Animal - 1; Miscellaneous - 3; DUI/DWI - 1; Parking Violation - 1; Traffic Stop - 3; Disabled Vehicle - 1; Traffic Stop - 2; Motor Vehicle Accident - 1. An accompanying chart showed a graph of police calls for the first five months of 2012. Calls increased sharply in the months of January, February, and March, while falling gradually from March’s peak into April and May. One might posit that the warmest March since 1945 has some correlation to the heavier-than-usual police calls during that month.

Under old business, President Beavan brought up the subject of ditches; open ditches vs. enclosed ditches to be exact. Councilmen discussed the problems created by enclosing ditches, and it was decided to resolve the issue with a motion, “To prohibit the enclosure of any ditch in the boro without council approval.” Council approved the motion despite the lone “nay” of Councilman Agler.

Under new business, President Beavan discussed two items relating to water. He recounted the boro’s drilling of their well in 1980 and the now-required license renewal procedure with its implications for boro finances should relief not be granted.

His second water item made clear that Oakland boro council is looking long-term in their relationship with local water. President Beavan described in detail what it would take for the council to establish a Water Authority: a public hearing; a council resolution; submission of an application with a $2,500 to $3,000 fee; appointment of five members to the Water Authority Board for initial staggered terms of one to five years. He made clear that only residents of Oakland boro, or individuals with a business in Oakland, were eligible to serve on the Water Board. And those serving (in the five non-paid positions) on the Water Authority Board, while being appointed by the boro council, would be independent of council and not under their control. Finances for the Water Authority would be totally separate from the boro’s.

Why might the boro want to establish a Water Authority? The Water Authority would be an independent non-profit entity not subject to Pennsylvania Utility Commission (PUC) rates. As such it could set its own water rates. Councilmen are optimistic that the Water Authority can set water rates for boro residents lower than those set by the PUC. President Beavan also pointed out that not a drop of water can be sold outside the boro unless a Water Authority is established. With Mr. Agler moving, and Mr. Rhone seconding the motion, council took the first step by unanimously agreeing “to establish a Water Authority for the Boro of Oakland.”

At 8:08 p.m. Oakland boro council adjourned from their deliberations. Councilmen will reassemble for next month’s boro business at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 12, at the Lanesboro Community Center.

Were it not for an hour-and-20-plus-minute executive session, Council President Roberta Kelly, Mayor William Perry, Jr., and council members Roy Williams, Paul Barnes, Sue Crawford, Joe Varsik, and Debbie Zayas could have knocked off the evening after only a 35-minute workout. As it turned out, the regular meeting was just a warm-up for the main, albeit private, main attraction. Councilman Allen Wolf was absent from the nearly two-hour marathon on Tuesday, June 12.

Council opened at 7 p.m. sharp. After completing routine housekeeping matters, i.e., approval of the evening’s agenda, the Bills List, and the minutes of May’s meetings, the evening‘s theme gradually took form and substance. In the public comment period of the meeting two gentlemen spoke up to share with council their progress in pushing back blight. The first was Emerson Whitehead. In a terse, but friendly, manner he declared the headway he had made in clearing a decrepit garage.

Andreas Plonka, representative of the new owner of Starrucca House, took a few minutes to fully explain the status of the former restaurant, which had seen its heyday as the boro’s Erie Railroad Station a century ago. Mr. Plonka described the renovations interior and exterior which are in progress or intended for completion within the next 12 months. Starrucca House will be reopening as a restaurant, and also boast a railroading museum not exclusively focused on the Erie RR. A perhaps curious, if not daunting, obstacle to the restaurant’s economic success is the matter of the adjoining parking lots, which were acquired by someone other than the present owner of Starrucca House. Nevertheless, Mr. Plonka went to pains to stress his close cooperation with the boro’s Codes Enforcement Officer, Mary Weaver. Ensuring correction of all deficiencies and conformity to the boro’s building code is the focus of their collaborative efforts. President Reddon thanked Mr. Plonka for keeping the boro abreast of the situation. She noted that the restoration of the structure from its current blighted state will have a salutary effect on the boro.

Mayor Perry initiated his Mayor’s Report with an anecdote of a “distraught” Front Street resident who had beautification in mind when he set out new plants and shrubs . . . perhaps just a little too closely to the right-of-way. Council Vice-President Roy Williams took responsibility for authorizing the area‘s mowing by Streets Commissioner Steve Glover. Mr. Glover added that he had worked out the situation with the resident. Henceforth, increased circumspection will guide mowing and brush-clearing operations in the boro.

Shifting into blight-fight mode, Mayor Perry asserted he had “zero tolerance” for blight in another incarnation, namely, that of ATV joy-riders invading Reddon Park. Mr. Mayor noted, with a gleam in his eyes, that the press were present. Press publicity of his declared war would give blighters fair warning that a wide berth from Reddon Park would be in their best interests, lest they desire a more personal relationship with local law enforcement and the criminal justice system. And on that note, Mayor Perry praised the boro’s police force for their participation in a recent drug bust in the tri-boro area. Council and meeting attendees applauded Chief Sweet, present, and law enforcement authorities of the local, county, and state stripe for their efforts in fighting the area’s drug-blight.

Moving on to old business, council approved a “Motion for Solicitor to draft Act 90 Ordinance.” Act 90 Ordinance is - you guessed it - the boro’s Blight Ordinance. Attorney Briechle’s legal work, when completed and ratified by council, will serve as another weapon in the boro’s arsenal against property blight. Other old business included the awarding of a contract in the amount of $325 to “A* Plus Lines & Signs” of New Milford to paint crosswalk and parking lot lines. Also passed was a motion to move $1,975 from the boro’s budget at line item 487.157 (Buy Out) to line item 410.131 (Police Part-Time).

In new business, council approved a motion for Solicitor Briechle to review the boro’s Employee Handbook, and a second motion to approve QuickBooks (Payroll) training in Towanda for boro secretary Diann Robbins. Segueing into the Secretary’s Report, Ms. Robbins reported that the Secretary/Treasurer’s Office would be closed on June 13 due to out-of-office training. That announcement wrapped up all public agenda items and sent council into a marathon executive session for the next 80-plus minutes.

When council returned from executive session, President Reddon presented three motions for council’s consideration and passage. With unanimous agreement, council members agreed:

To create a part-time seasonal streets-worker position, paying $9 per hour, to be paid for out of the Capital Reserve Fund.

To approve the Treasurer’s Job Description.

To approve basic municipal budget training for boro secretary Diann Robbins in Williamsport, PA, on August 10.

Council adjourned just before nine. Members wearily rose from their chairs and made for the doors after a long evening of deliberations. One last note on blight, lest any homeowners think they can remain neutral in the boro’s War on Blight: an ad will be likely forthcoming in local newspapers to provide International Property Maintenance Code (IMPC) guidelines to boro homeowners. The ad in online newspaper editions will have a hyperlink to the 20 pages of IMPC guidelines. IMPC guidelines will also be hyperlinked from the boro’s website.

The war on blight, be it related to property, illicit drugs, or behavior may be thankless and never-ending, but Susquehanna Depot’s Blight-Fight will not be lost for lack of effort or diligence, at least so far as this administration is concerned.

Susky solons muster for their next regular meeting on Tuesday, July 10, at 7 p.m.

Obstacles serve a purpose: they give us a chance to find out how badly we want something.

There was a larger than normal crowd at the June 7th meeting of the New Milford borough council. Much of the crowd appeared to be present regarding two matters - the elder housing development on Church Street, and the recent gunshots that weren't at the Park View hotel.

Mr. Briechle spoke first, stating that he wanted to create a record for the modification of the district from an I-1 to a D-1 district. This modification had already been done the previous year, but it was being redone to ensure that it was fully compliant. Additionally, the council was seeking to modify the ordinance to allow apartment conversions to be a permitted use under a D-1 zone. Mr. Briechle proceeded through some technicalities necessary for the process, including asking the secretary whether the property owners and surrounding residents were notified regarding the alteration, to which question she responded in the affirmative. It was also clarified that the borough and county planning commissions were notified of the change, and that letters had been received from both. The township, the school district, the Columbia Hose company, and the municipal authority were also notified. The redistricting of the property was posted, by the codes enforcement officer. A legal notice had been published in the Susquehanna County Independent as well.

It was stated that other than the planning commissions there were no other written responses. A public hearing was then opened, for public comment on the matter. Attorney Larry Durkin was present, representing Wayne Bradley and HL Bradley Farms, Inc. He said that for the record, they had the same objections as were well known to the council, and wished to bring to their attention that he did not believe that there had ever been a map attached to the documents. They all indicated that the official map of the borough was also to be changed, and he did not believe that this had been included in any of the ads. He felt that the council ought to submit the included changes in the map. He continued by stating that, at that time, they renewed the objections presented at the March meeting of the zoning hearing board of 2011, which were included in the appeals of the actions taken by the zoning hearing board and the council at that time. He stated that he found it interesting that council had employed not one but two lawyers to represent the council in the upcoming appeal. Also, he thought it interesting that council had taken the position that the appeal was not well founded, yet was going back a year later to dot the i's and cross the t's. He said that two appeals had been filed on behalf of Wayne Bradley to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and that his clients objected to any action to change the zone.

Scott Young then spoke up, being a common property owner on the north side of the property in question. He wondered aloud if there really were two lawyers representing council. The borough's solicitor, Mr. Briechle, responded that it was only he. It was clarified that the second lawyer was representing the Susquehanna County Housing and Development Corporation (SCHDC).

Mr. Young then said that he had some questions on what happened to the industrial commercial status of his one acre located to the north of the proposed low-income development site. It was clarified that the development was to be for elder housing, not the sort of low-income housing which he appeared to be thinking of.

Mr. Young then asked what became of his rights, if he could continue to use his property for the purpose for which he purchased it. He asked if his property was included in the zoning. When it was responded that it was, he asked if the project could continue without including his property. Mr. Briechle said at this time this was not possible. When asked why, it was responded that this was because the SCHDC was under tight time constraints to move ahead with the rezoning. It was, however, Mr. Young's right to ask the council to bring the land out of the D-1 back to the I-1, Mr. Briechle added. Mr. Young sounded somewhat agitated at this point, suggesting that it was ridiculous that he should give up his rights now and then ask for them back with expectations of gaining that right. He did not see this as a viable option to what he saw now as industrial commercial rights to his land. The proposed ordinance, it was clarified, was to change the entire district, including his land. He asked if anyone on the board could honestly suggest why he ought to be asked to give up rights to his land in the interest of this zoning change. Mr. Ainey asked Mr. Briechle if they could change their ordinance as long as they followed the process multiple times. He asked if they could pursue the original motion and then initiate a proposal to do as Mr. Young asked. It was responded that they could.

Mr. Ainey said that they were pretty devoted to this housing project, stating that he felt elder housing was a good thing. Mr. Young asked if it was good enough to buy him out. How exactly his land might be pulled out of the zoning change was clarified, and it was suggested that it might be able to be done within thirty days.

Mr. Durkin then rejoined the conversation, expressing a wish to make a remark which he said was not in defense of Mr. Young's position or otherwise, except to say that there was a concept of spot zoning in Pennsylvania and that his client would not sit back and watch a succession of council meetings in which they put areas in a zone and then took them back. He said that this practice was frowned upon by the appellates, and that it would not go unopposed, and would not happen in a month. Mr. Ainey asked if Mr. Briechle would defend what he proposed, and it was responded that he would. There was some more discussion regarding this.

Mr. Briechle then asked if Mr. Young was aware that his property had already been rezoned. Mr. Young asked what they were doing that evening then. It was responded that the rezoning was being reconfirmed in response to some questions regarding Mr. Durkin. Mr. Durkin said that Mr. Young was speaking up about a year after the fact. Notifications were sent out at that time, it was pointed out. There were two appeals, Mr. Briechle said for the record. It was ruled at a lower court that the appeal was frivolous, but it was sitting before the Commonwealth Court at that time. Mr. Briechle said that they felt confident that they had done everything perfectly fine, and that the courts would uphold them. Mr. Young stated that he had not known that his property had already been rezoned, in May of the previous year.

Mr. Durkin asked, for clarification purposes, if there was an application before the council; it was responded that the housing corporation had requested the action at the last borough council meeting.

Mr. Young then had questions about the deeds. He said that the SCHDC had purchased 1.78 acres in January, and it was confirmed that there was then a subdivision. Mr. Young asked when the corporation had purchased the remaining land. Mr. Briechle said that he would have to ask the corporation. Mr. Briechle asked to see the deed. Mr. Young said that the courthouse did not appear to have a second deed. The 2.77 acres was conveyed, Mr. Young continued, to the New Milford Senior Housing LLP, SCHDC sold and deeded themselves .99 acres to make up the difference but there was no deed to that effect. He asked how they could sell undeeded property.

Ms. Gulick spoke up then, stating that when Mr. Young had spoken with her at the courthouse he had 3 deeds. She asserted that the containing acreage was 2.77 acres in one of them. One deed was the entire piece (2.77 acres), one for 1.78, and one for the subdivision of .99 acres, The subdivision had been from the SCHDC to itself, and the remaining 1.78 acres had also been deeded from the corporation to itself. Mr. Young asked if this was a laundering process, and Mr. Briechle advised that council not even respond to the question. Mr. Young said that he wouldn't care at all- if the area needed housing it needed housing- but he didn't think that he'd now be able to put his cement block plant on that land and have it favorably received. Mr. Briechle asked if he had any plans ready to put before council that they might take into consideration. Mr. Young did not, but he felt there was a problem with the flow of properties. He asked about the plans for the .99 acres and it was reiterated that he would have to ask the corporation. Mr. Ainey asked what was on the 1.78 acres currently, and it was responded a factory was located there currently, with the roof falling in.

Mr. Durkin asked a question about the subdivision of the 2.77 acres, wondering when the application was presented. Mr. Briechle did not have the records and it was said that it went before the Susquehanna County Planning Commission, and that borough was notified of it. There was not a local subdivision ordinance, such matters were dealt with at the county level. Mr. Young asked council to look into the subdivision plans, as they pertained to the land use adjacent to his property.

Mr. Durkin said that on behalf of his clients he would second Mr. Young's suggestion. And also ask if a copy of the application for this zone change had been submitted to council and if they might be given a coy of it. Mr. Briechle said a copy would be given, if there was one.

The comment period of the hearing was then closed and a five minute recess taken.

Mr. Briechle asked, when the meeting was reconvened, for a role call vote to adopt the proposed ordinance. It passed.

Mr. Ainey then made a motion that council direct the solicitor to investigate and initiate the rezoning of Mr. Young's property to an I-1, based upon his findings. Two members abstained, and three voted against the motion, such that it did not pass.

Council decided, given the number of people present, that the first hearing of visitors be moved up then, prior to an executive session. A visitor spoke up, wishing to clarify the topic of gunshots which had been discussed at a prior meeting. A resident had reported to a council member that shots had been fired at the Parkview Hotel. There were gunshots that night, the visitor asserted, but they were not from the Parkview. She wanted to know what was being printed before it was put in the paper. There was a witness, she continued, who could tell them where the shots had come from. Two men had been chasing a skunk, and shooting at it near the creek. Two men spoke up to confirm this assertion, James Poff and James Watts. Mr. Poff said that he had seen guys in the creek with a .38 revolver and spoken with them, telling them that shooting was not allowed in the borough. Mr. Watts said that he had gone to his porch that evening and could tell that the shots were coming from the left of him, not the right as would be the case were they proceeding from the bar. It was also stated that two calls had been made to the police, and that they had investigated the matter. Ms. Gulick responded that someone had brought the incident to council's attention, and that council did not control what was put in the paper.

Mr. Poff said then that he had been told that he would have to come to the meeting to file an official complaint if he wanted something done about the decibels of the town's noon siren. He said that he had lived here for about 10 years. When he was in the park one time when the siren went off, he continued, it had actually hurt his ears. It also hurt the ears of the kids in the park, he continued. He felt that it should be tested to make sure it wasn't doing damage to anyone's ears. Mr. Watts agreed, pointing out that there were people who worked third shift who lived in close proximity to the siren. Mr. Watts said that he knew there had always been a noon whistle, but in this modern age he did not think it necessary. Ms. Gulick said that the siren was for emergency purposes, and had to be loud. Mr. Poff responded that noon was not an emergency. It was stated however that it had run at that time for years. Ms. Gulick continued that council had been advised that having it continually ring once a day was better for the siren than to let it sit silent. The whistle was bought after 2006, when there had been evacuations. She said that they could look into the matter, and whether there was a way to adjust the volume.

Mary Fancher then spoke up, saying that she did not understand all the negative comments about the housing development. She said that the foundry was an eyesore, and that the development would help make the town a place where people would want to come and live. She didn't understand why people wouldn't want it. She felt that it was a good thing that council would do this for the town. Mr. Ainey said that they agreed, which is why they had spent $25,000 in legal fees to defend it. Ms. Cosmello said that if based on former models which the corporation had completed, the project would be beautiful. Mr. Young quipped that he didn't understand why no one would want him to have his commercial industrial zone for his one acre.

At this point council went into an executive session for litigation purposes.

When they returned, a motion was made to direct the borough's solicitor to represent both the zoning hearing board and the borough council in regards to the litigation with Mr. Bradley. This was motioned once council exited the executive session.

Ms. Gulick then stated that she wanted to revisit Mr. Ainey's second motion regarding Mr. Young's property. Mr. Ainey said that they did what they needed to do, and that Mr. Durkin had made some good points about spot zoning. Mayor Taylor opined that spot zoning wasn't right but was legal. Ms. Gulick asked to clarify Mr. Ainey's motion. It was explained that the motion had been to investigate and initiate the process. Ms. Gulick asked if it could be revisited, and requested that they do so. Mr. Ainey said that he had no problem remaking the motion. Certain council members said that they would be willing to revisit it. Mr. Ainey pointed out that there would be two chances to vote on the matter again, were the motion approved. Ms. Gulick said that she misunderstood, and Mr. White said that he thought he did as well. All that the motion incorporated was that the attorney investigate and move on the subject if he felt it was viable. Mr. White, who had abstained earlier due to a lack of knowledge, felt better, he said knowing more information, but he still abstained. Ms. James still voted nay until she had more information. All other council members voted in favor of the motion, which passed this second time.

During the treasurer's report, Ms. Cosmello and Mr. Ainey gave a report on finances. Ms. Cosmello said that they had been through every account, every statement, and every balance sheet, and that some things just hadn't added up, so they had gone through everything and adjustments had been made. They wanted to put into motion some changes in how the treasurer's report had been presented. Some of the numbers given in the last few months hadn't been exactly right, but the problems had been rectified. As of that day the council would move forward as to how things were done. Ms. Cosmello felt that council had too many accounts, and proposed that the highway and savings account be closed, and consolidated into the checking account.

Mr. Ainey explained that what had happened was that for the last several years there was a journal in the computer, which council hadn't seen. A lot of times things were turned over or were not entered into the excel spreadsheet which generated the report they did see. Ms. Gulick agreed that there were too many accounts. Council felt they needed to start condensing.

Another suggestion was made to authorize the secretary to pay regular bills, such as electric and water bills, without coming before council. This would include regular monthly bills but not contractor bills, etc. A motion was not made, but the secretary was asked to bring a list of regular bills to the next meeting.

Another suggestion was that the second meeting of the month be the financial meeting, such that all of the bank statements could be present for consideration and the bills would be in by that time. This motion was made and approved.

The next motion was to get rid of the report currently in use, requesting that the report come right from QuickBooks. This was also approved. As of that date, Ms. Cosmello reiterated, everything balanced. Ms. Gulick thanked Ms. Hine for her work.

Southwest Energy had sent a check for over $67,000, which had been deposited. Mr. Ainey suggested that Ms. Hine investigate cd rates. He suggested that council set that money aside and leave it there. It appeared she had already completed some investigation.

Mayor Taylor reported that the contractor hadn't been able to work on the bridge on Church Street by the foundry due to the rain. Other projects were still waiting for FEMA approval.

The street sweeper was to come the following Monday. Storm drains were taking precedence over pot holes, it was stated during the street department report.

Several street signs were stolen from within the borough, Mr. White reported. He requested that anyone with information about these thefts please contact the borough.

Ms. Hine had spoken with someone at PennDot regarding the plan to close Lackawanna street. The plan had been approved but there were restrictions. There would be one lane on Main Street. Someone would be able to pull out of the street but could only make right turns. Ms. Hine asked when the work would be done, and it had been responded that the plan was not to open bids until April of 2013.

Ms. Wages asked if council should think about making that a one way street. Mr. Ainey said that a concern in the past had been safety at the post office. There was supposed, Ms. Gulick said, to be no parking on the church side of the street. The signs had never been put up.

The Church Street bridge with a 2 ton limit was mentioned again. A school bus had been seen driving over it, and a dump truck with a load of stone had as well. The school had been contacted regarding this matter. PennDot had said that they were going to be working on the Main Street bridge of Johnson Street creek in the near future.

Don Burns had donated small rip/rap for use in the creeks and with flooding issues. He offered it at no cost. There was some discussion about this, and about whether some ought to be stock piled for Johnson Street should it be needed. The material would be available for borough residents use, within the borough only. The use had to be approved, and it had to be signed off on with a waiver. Residents with need for it could contact council. Ms. Gulick said that it was very nice of him to donate the material, and felt that the borough ought to send him a thank you.

This led to a discussion of several other people and businesses which deserved appreciation. This included the volunteers who had done work at the Midtown Park, and the pool park. The Midtown Festival was called a success, and appreciation noted for the businesses which provided gifts for the raffles, and the Pump and Pantry and the Market for their help with the concessions. Compliments had been received. It was stated that really good people ran the businesses in the town. Mr. Ainey mentioned as well that he wanted to send a thank you to the superintendent, the school board, the principal, and the band, thanking them for the concert in the park and encouraging them to do more of them. The Lynn-Lee house was thanked for donating the flowers and the flower boxes out front of the borough building. The Legion and VFW were thanked for holding Memorial Day services in the park. Ms. Gulick said that it was nice to have so many community members coming out to help. Mr. Carey thanked council, as he had seen police sitting near the stop sign and the pool park.

Mr. White reported that he had spoken with some contractors regarding the island in the creek, who were working on the bids for it. It was asked what would be done with it once it was dug out. New Milford Township would like the material, it was suggested then. The logistics of this would need to be worked out however.

The stormwater drain by the Pump and Pantry was backed up, it was said. Mr. White was seeking council approval to get it cleaned out.

Ms. Gulick said that the hazard mitigation plan had been completed. It was to be ready for public view on June fifteenth. Ms. Cosmello said that one of the things which had been liked about the borough's plan was the siren. It was stated that their website was excellent, which could be accessed through www.susqco.com.

The borough code was revised, it was adopted, and it was to take effect on July 16th, Mr. Ainey reported to council.

Burglary: Clista Goff of New Milford reported that a burglary occurred at her store, the P&C Thrift Store on Sr 11 in Great Bend Township, over the weekend preceding June 12th. An undetermined amount of money was removed from the store, after entrance was made through a window. The investigation was ongoing as of the time of report. Anyone with information is asked to please contact PSP Gibson at (570) 465-3154.

Theft: A Nicholson woman reported the theft of some medication from her Lenox Township residence on May 7th at 5:15 a,m.

Criminal Mischief: Two wooden doors and two windows were damaged at the Newman Cemetery in Great Bend township between the 1st and 13th of June. The damage was done with an unknown object; anyone with additional information is asked to please contact the police.

Crash: On June 8th at 4:45 Joel Thompson left from an intersection on Rt. 1012 in New Milford Township backwards rather than forward, lost control, struck an embankment, and rolled over. Thompson was utilizing a seat belt; he sustained minor injury.

Theft from a Motor Vehicle: On June 12th between noon and 5:52 p.m. the vehicle belonging to a Hallstead woman was entered while parked on Rail Road Ave., and $180 of US currency taking from a wallet located within. Anyone with information is asked to please contact the police.

Theft by Unlawful Taking: On June 12th at 4:30 p.m. an unknown black male wearing a multicolored shirt and a New York Yankees hat paid for a $2 lottery ticket with a $50 bill at the Lenox Shell Station in Lenox township. While the cashier was making change the thief handed over another large bill and requested smaller denominations. The process repeated for approximately 4 minutes, and when the man walked out the cashier closed his drawer. When the count of the drawer was completed approximately 2 hours later it was discovered that the drawer was short $200. The perpetrator is believed to be traveling with a blonde, white, female. Anyone with information is asked to lease contact the police.

Trespass: Michael Dalton of Brackney is charged with trespass after being on the property of the Choconut Inn without permission, on June 12th.

Theft: On May 29th between 11 pm and midnight an Excel pressure washer was stolen from outside the garage of a New Milford man. Anyone with information is asked to please contact the police.

Collision-Traffic: On June 12th at 1:57 am Christopher Stiehl of the Factoryville area was traveling south bound on Sr 29 in Springville township when his vehicle left the southbound travel lane, crossed the center of the roadway, exited onto the northbound shoulder, and impacted a series of guardrails. The vehicle then crossed over the guardrails, impacted a utility pole, and struck several trees prior to coming to a rest over an embankment. A passenger, Courtney Thomas of the Nicholson area, was injured during the collision and transported via ambulance to CMC Scranton Hospital. Stiehl fled the scene prior to police response. The investigation was ongoing as of the time of report.

Harassment: PSP Gibson is investigating an incident in which Jeffery Heller is accused of threatening to burn down the home of a Lanesboro man. Heller was cited for harassment.

Crash: On June 9th at 6:15 p.m. a vehicle described as a red or maroon Honda Civic was traveling east on Sr 171 in Oakland Township when it exited the roadway at 28874 and struck a fence, a utility pole, and 2 mailboxes. The vehicle then fled the scene. Anyone with information is asked to please contact the police.

Crash: On June 10th at 11:21 a.m. Brandon Gilley of Sebastian, Fl was traveling north on SR 81 in Great Bend township when a bear ran out into the right lane from the east and struck the right front side of his Kia Soul. Gilley was utilizing a seat belt; he was not injured.

DUI: On June 10th at 3:04 p.m. Michael Seeley of Rush was traveling southbound on Sr 267, while operating a Craftsman lawn tractor. It was determined that he was under the influence of alcohol. Seeley was subsequently taken into custody for suspicion of DUI and transported to the Endless Mountains Health Systems for chemical testing. Charges were pending BAC results as of the time of report.

Burglary: Sometime between May 27th and June 8th a summer home in Little Meadows, Apolacon township belonging to a Vestal man was broken into. The incident occurred as entrance was made through a rear door located on the deck, which may have been left unlocked (as it showed no signs of forced entry). Entrance was then obtained to the garage area by means of a forced side door. Numerous items were removed from both locations, and the scene fled. Items taken included: a Minnkota Power Drive trolling motor (black and white in color), a black and white Minnkota troll motor, a red and black battery charger, a blue and white Kobalt air compressor, 2 red Homelight gas operated weed wackers, a glass jar of US currency (coins), and three red gas containers. Anyone with information is asked to please contact the police.

Crash: On June 9th at 5:19 p.m. Dwayne Conklin of Susquehanna was traveling south on Sr 4007 in Bridgewater township when his motorcycle laid down on its left side and slide off the east side of the roadway. Conklin was utilizing a helmet; he sustained moderate injury.

Crash: On June 8th at 4:38 p.m. Justin Johnson of Susquehanna was driving on I 81 in Great Bend township when he fell asleep while traveling in the passing lane and exited the west berm. The vehicle's left front side subsequently impacted the guide rail, proceeding to ride the rail for approximately 500 feet before coming to a final rest against it. Johnson was utilizing a seat belt; he was not injured.

Theft or Missing Property: On June 8th at 3:48 p.m. a Rush township man arrived at the PSP Gibson Barracks and reported that he is unsure if he misplaced his .22 caliber rifle or if it had been stolen. The incident occurred in the summer of last year, and the rifle was described as a .22 caliber brown wood stock. Anyone with information is asked to please contact the police.

Criminal Mischief: A crime occurred as swastikas were painted on a sliding board and fence located within the Joyce Deck Memorial Park in Hallstead borough.

Burglary: On June 7th between 9 and 11:30 a.m. forced entry was obtained to a Harford Township residence, by means of the front door. Nothing appeared to be taken from inside the residence, but a Whirlpool AC window unit was taken from the back deck. Anyone with information is asked to contact the police.

Criminal Mischief: PSP Gibson was investigating an incident in which a rock was thrown through the glass entry door of a John Deere grader parked along Griffis Hill Road, and belonging to Jessup township. Anyone with information is asked to contact the police.

Theft: Aluminum siding was stripped and taken possession of from a vacant house in Lenox township sometime between May 13th and 21st.

Crash: On June 2nd at 3:35 pm Joseh Pish of Stanley, Va was traveling north on sr 267 when he contacted an oil-covered pave sealant on the road surface which caused him to lose traction and ultimately to lose control. He then lost his balance and the motorcycle fell to the ground, sliding to an uncontrolled rest on the west shoulder. Pish was thrown from the motorcycle and reached a resting place lying on the highway. He was utilizing a helmet; he sustained major injury.

Theft: Between June 2nd and 4th two Moultrie Gamespy D-551 RXT game cameras were reportedly stolen from Northeast Stone Works in Bridgewater township.

Anyone having information regarding any of these incidents is asked to please contact PSP Gibson at (570) 465-3154.

The Susquehanna County DOMESTIC RELATIONS Section has outstanding BENCH WARRANTS for the following individuals as of 10:08 a.m. on June 15, 2012: Craig J. Anderson, Jr, Sharon Baker, Michael Robert Brown, Tina M. Clark, Marc K. Deesch, David J. Fischer, MaryJo Gana, Donald Goble, Keith R. Hurd, John J. Jenisky, Jr, Steven L. Jones, James Karhnak, Kay L. Knolles, Lee Labor, Todd J. Layton, Charlie J. Legere, Derrick J. Lezinsky, Michael A. Linden, Michael Maryasz, Brian C. Mirra, Ronald N. Mitchell, Perry Rohan, Bruce A. Schurr, Christie L. Sheptock, David J. Shiner, Eric J. Snell, Jermaine J. Stanfield, Sr., Justin S. Thompson, Robert J. Twilley, Ryan Warnagiris, Steven G. Warner, Jesse J. Yachymiak, Please contact the Domestic Relations Section at 570-278-4600 ext. 170 with any information on the location of these individuals.